Lawsuit
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Tabak
A lawsuit challenging health agencies’ practice of blocking social media comments containing keywords associated with viewpoints critical of animal testing
On September 9, 2021, the Knight Institute, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), and the Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a lawsuit seeking to stop the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) from automatically blocking comments containing keywords associated with viewpoints critical of animal testing from the agencies’ social media pages. The suit was filed on behalf of PETA as well as two animal rights advocates. All three have had their comments to the NIH’s Facebook or Instagram pages hidden because they were critical of, or contained keywords associated with criticism of, the government’s role in animal testing. PETA also discovered that the HHS blocks all comments containing the term “monkey” after its employees attempted to communicate on the HHS’s Facebook page.
The lawsuit alleges that the NIH and HHS Facebook and Instagram pages, which are open for comments from the general public, are public forums. It argues that by automatically hiding from public view comments containing keywords associated with animal rights advocacy, like “torture” or “PETA,” Director Tabak and Secretary Becerra have excluded speech from public forums based on viewpoint and unconstitutional content-based restrictions. It also argues that these activities deprive the plaintiffs of the opportunity to read other comments using the blocked keywords.
Status: On July 30, 2024, the D.C. Circuit held that the NIH's use of keyword blocking violated the First Amendment and instructed the district court to enter summary judgment on behalf of the Plaintiffs.
Court Information: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Tabak, No. 1:21-cv-02380 (D.D.C.), No. 23-5110 (D.C. Cir.).
Press Statements
-
Federal Court Says National Institutes of Health Censored Critics on Social Media in Violation of First Amendment
-
Animal Rights Advocates To Appeal Court Ruling Upholding Federal Agency Practice of Censorship on Social Media
-
National Institutes of Health Violating First Amendment by Suppressing Animal Advocacy on Agency’s Social Media Accounts, Animal Rights Groups Say
-
Animal Rights Advocates File First Amendment Lawsuit against Government for Blocking Critical Comments on Health Agencies’ Social Media Accounts
Legal Filings
Click to highlight response chains
-
D.C. Cir.
-
D.D.C.
-
Opinion
-
Order
-
Plaintiffs' Response
-
Government's Notice of Supplemental Authority
-
Exhibit A: Krasno v. Mnookin
-
NIH's Response
-
Plaintiffs' Notice of Supplemental Authority
-
Government's Reply
-
Plaintiffs' Reply
-
Exhibit 56
-
Exhibit 57
-
Government's Opposition
-
Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment
-
Joint Stipulation
-
Index of Exhibits
-
Exhibits 1–10
-
Exhibits 11–20
-
Exhibits 21–30
-
Exhibits 31–40
-
Exhibits 41–50
-
Exhibits 51–55
-
Joint Status Report
-
Complaint
-
Attachment 1
-
Attachment 2
-