Press-related prosecutions under the Espionage Act
Legal filings in Espionage Act prosecutions of individuals accused of disclosing information to the press and public
This Reading Room contains key court filings related to all Espionage Act prosecutions of those accused of disclosing information to the press or to the general public. Passed more than a century ago, the Espionage Act has long been used by the government to prosecute whistleblowers for disclosing information to the press. Recently, there has been an uptick in these prosecutions under the Obama and Trump administrations, which have charged more whistleblowers under the Espionage Act than all prior administrations combined. For an interactive graph and chart of all press-related prosecutions under the Espionage Act, click here.
Showing 111–120 of 180
-
District Ct. Op., United States v. Kiriakou, No. 1:12-cr-00127 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2012)
District court's denial of Kiriakou's motion to dismiss Counts One-Four of the indictment for vagueness and overbreadth, relying in large part on the Morison Fourth Circuit precedent.
-
Manning's Resp. to Mot. to Preclude, United States v. Manning (U.S. Army 1st Judicial Circuit Apr. 12, 2012)
Manning's response to the prosecution's motion to preclude Manning's reference to actual harm or damage.
-
Indictment re: John Kiriakou, United States v. Kiriakou, No. 1:12-cr-00127 (E.D. Va. Apr. 5, 2012)
Grand jury indictment charging John Kiriakou under Section 793(d) of the Espionage Act.
-
Criminal Compl. re: John Kiriakou, United States v. Kiriakou, No. 1:12-cr-00127 (E.D. Va. Jan. 23, 2012)
Criminal complaint listing Kiriakou's charges under Section 793(d) of the Espionage Act.
-
Sterling Opp'n re: Gov't Mot. in Lim. re: Certain Evidence and Arguments, United States v. Sterling, No. 1:10-cr-00485 (E.D. Va. filed under seal Oct. 11, 2011, cleared for public release Feb. 8, 2012)
Sterling's opposition re: Government's motion in limine to exclude certain evidence and arguments.
-
Gov't Mot. in Lim. re: Certain Evidence and Arguments, United States v. Sterling, No. 1:10-cr-00485 (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2011)
Government's motion in limine to exclude certain evidence and arguments, including evidence or argument related to selective prosecution or justification defenses.
-
District Ct. Op., United States v. Kim, 808 F. Supp. 2d 44 (D.D.C. 2011)
District court's denial of Kim's motion to dismiss Count One of the indictment on both his vagueness claim and First Amendment argument.
-
District Ct. Op., United States v. Sterling, 818 F. Supp. 2d 945 (E.D. Va. 2011)
District court's quashing of the subpoena for Risen's testimony about his reporting and sources because of a First Amendment-based reporter's privilege. Court held Risen could only be required to provide testimony authenticating the accuracy of his journalism, subject to a protective order.
-
Judgment re: Thomas Drake, United States v. Drake, No. 1:10-cr-00181(D. Md. July 15, 2011)
Judgment accepting Drake's guilty plea and sentencing Drake to one year on probation, 240 hours of community service, and a $25 criminal penalty.
-
Risen Mot. to Quash Subpoena, United States v. Sterling, No. 1:10-cr-00485 (E.D. Va. June 21, 2011)
James Risen's motion to quash subpoena directed to him and/or for a protective order because his testimony is protected by the reporter's privilege under the First Amendment and federal common law.