The OLC
Astrid Da Silva

The OLC's Opinions

Opinions published by the OLC, including those released in response to our FOIA lawsuit

This Reading Room is a comprehensive database of published opinions written by the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). It contains the approximately 1,400 opinions published by the OLC in its online database and the opinions produced in Freedom of Information Act litigation brought by the Knight Institute, including opinions about the Pentagon Papers, the Civil Rights Era, and the War Powers Act. It also contains indexes of unclassified OLC opinions written between 1945 and February 15, 1994 (these indexes were created by the OLC and intended to be comprehensive). We have compiled those indexes into a single list here and in .csv format here. This Reading Room also contains an index of all classified OLC opinions issued between 1974 and 2021, except those classified or codeword-classified at a level higher than Top Secret (the OLC created this index, too, and intended it to be comprehensive).

The Knight Institute will continue updating the reading room with new records. To get alerts when the OLC publishes a new opinion in its database, follow @OLCforthepeople on Twitter.

Showing 13111320 of 2202

  • Rights-of-Way Across National Forests

    The Act of June 4, 1897, does not grant a right of access to owners of land surrounded by national forests, other than actual settlers, and the Secretary of Agriculture has discretionary authority to deny such access unless a right otherwise exists. The common law doctrine of easement by necessity does not apply to land owned by the federal government, but a right of access may be implied from the terms of a federal land grant in some circumstances. No statutes currently modify any such implied right found to exist. Absent a prior existing access right, the Secretary of Agriculture may deny "adequate access" to land within a national forest wilderness area, but must offer a land exchange as indemnity. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/file/22291/download.

    6/23/1980

  • Attorney General's Authority to Reprogram Funds for the United States Marshals Service to Avoid Deficiencies

    The Attorney General has authority to reallocate funds among programs of the United States Marshals Service and to make available to the Service funds presently allocated to other programs and activities funded through the same lump sum appropriation. An agency head's discretion to reprogram appropriated funds within a lump sum appropriation account in an antideficiency situation would be limited only if a specific statutory directive required the expenditure or distribution of funds in a particular manner. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/file/24546/download.

    6/20/1980

  • Constitutionality of Legislation Establishing the Cost Accounting Standards Board

    If the Cost Accounting Standards Board (CASB) is viewed as an Executive Branch entity, the statutory mechanism for appointing its members is unconstitutional under the Appointments Clause; however, it can be argued that the CASB is a Legislative Branch entity, and that its action in promulgating cost accounting standards is advisory with respect to executive agencies. The Department of Justice has a duty to defend the constitutionality of a statute except in exceptional circumstances, and it thus may be appropriate to bring to a court's attention any plausible argument that would permit the court to uphold a statute. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/file/24541/download.

    6/19/1980

  • Providing Representation for Federal Employees Under Investigation by Their Inspector General

    Neither the Department of Justice nor any other federal agency has authority to provide legal representation to a federal employee in disciplinary proceedings instituted by his own agency. Authority to provide counsel to a federal employee may be implied only where the employee's official conduct has been attacked by a nongovernmental plaintiff or a state prosecutive office, and not by an agency of the government itself. An Inspector General's Office is an integral part of the agency in which it is located, and its investigation of an agency employee is thus analogous to an investigation of Department of Justice employees by the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/file/24536/download.

    6/18/1980

  • Authority of the Comptroller General to Appoint an Acting Comptroller General

    The Comptroller General is authorized to designate an employee of the General Accounting Office to act as Comptroller General in his absence, even if the Office of Deputy Comptroller General is vacant. Acting heads of agencies have powers that are commensurate with those of agency heads who have been confirmed by the Senate. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/file/24531/download.

    6/13/1980

  • Effect of 31 U.S.C. § 484 on the Settlement Authority of the Attorney General

    A proposal whereby sums received in settlement of a suit brought by the United States and the Commonwealth of Virginia for environmental damage resulting from an oil spill would be donated to a waterfowl preservation organization, is barred by 31 U.S.C. § 484, which requires that all money received for the use of the United States be deposited in the Treasury. This requirement furthers the constitutional goal of reserving to Congress responsibility for determining whether and how public funds are to be spent. While the Comptroller General has found § 484 inapplicable in situations where the funds involved are received in trust for a particular purpose, this theory is usually insufficient to override the mandate of § 484 where the trust is created by nonstatutory executive action. In this case, where the United States has not incurred any monetary loss as a result of the oil spill, § 484 would not be offended by a settlement that attributed the entire sum received to its co-plaintiff, which could then direct the money to a charity. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/file/24526/download.

    6/13/1980

  • Cuban Obligation to Accept Returning Nationals

    Under customary international law, one state has a duty to another state to accept any of its own nationals who have been expelled from the other state. This duty between states to accept returning nationals is reinforced by a number of international instruments under which individuals have a right to return to their own country. Cuba's obligation to accept its returning nationals is intensified by evidence that it violated international law in expelling them in the first place. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/file/24516/download.

    6/6/1980

  • The President's Authority to Order Export of Special Nuclear Material Under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954

    The President has the power to order exports of special nuclear material under § 126 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, whenever he determines that "withholding the proposed export would be seriously prejudicial to the achievement of United States non-proliferation objectives, or would otherwise jeopardize the common defense and security." The full-scope safeguards criterion of § 128, which applies to exports of special nuclear material to non-nuclear weapon states, is binding only on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. While the President may take into account the expression of congressional policy contained in § 128 in deciding to order an export under § 126, including its affordance of a grace period, he is not bound by it. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/file/24521/download.

    6/6/1980

  • Constitutionality of Congress' Disapproval of Agency Regulations by Resolutions Not Presented to the President

    Section 431 of the General Education Provisions Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1232(d), which purports to authorize Congress, by concurrent resolutions that are not to be presented to the President for his approval or veto, to disapprove Department of Education regulations for education programs it administers, is unconstitutional. Legislative veto devices deny the President his power under Article I, § 7 of the Constitution, to veto legislation, interfere with his duty under Article II, § 3, faithfully to execute the laws, and arrogate to Congress power to interpret existing law that is constitutionally reserved to the judicial branch. The congressional disapproval provisions of the General Education Provisions Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1232(d), are severable from the substantive rulemaking authorities conferred by the Education Amendments of 1978, P.L. No. 95-561, 92 Stat. 2143. The Attorney General must scrutinize with caution any claim that he or any executive officer may decline to defend or enforce a statute whose constitutionality is merely in doubt. At the same time, the Executive is required to enforce the Constitution and to preserve the integrity of its functions against unconstitutional encroachments. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/file/22286/download.

    6/5/1980

  • Presidential Authority To Use Funds From the United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund

    The United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund, established by § 2(c) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, is available to cover the administrative costs of processing a recent influx of Cuban migrants to the United States, even though they have not been classified as refugees and are thus ineligible for assistance under other programs authorized by the Act. Congress intended the President to have discretion to use the Fund for any emergency situation involving unexpected refugee and migration needs, whenever and wherever it occurs. The OLC does not provide release dates for its opinions, so the release date listed is the date on which the opinion was authored. The original opinion is available at www.justice.gov/file/24506/download.

    6/5/1980

Related Content